We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn More \u203a<\/span><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n \n There\u2019s something magical about how ultralight tents push the envelope of protection for weight with their innovative designs and materials. Out of a sheet of wafer-thin fabric and a single trekking pole, you can make shelter suitable to withstand a range of three-season weather scenarios. Our only real complaint about ultralight tents is that you can\u2019t just go to a big box showroom and see them all set up side by side: Some of the best out there are made by smaller cottage companies that simply don\u2019t have that kind of reach. So for the inaugural Outdoor Life <\/em>backpacking gear test, we took a dozen of the best ultralight tents along a section of the 362-mile Oregon Coast Trail to see which would impress our experienced tester group. For the parameters of this test, we defined ultralight as weighing less than 2.5 pounds for a one-person tent, with a focus on tents with or unique designs.\u00a0<\/p>\n Ultralight tents push the boundaries of what you can do with a sheet of DCF<\/a>, a trekking pole, and a handful of titanium stakes. But with so many unique shapes and configurations, it can be hard to assess which will work best for your physical size and current backpacking kit, or the terrain you plan to travel through.\u00a0<\/p>\n To help you choose the right tent for your needs and experience, five OL contributors and editors with over 20,000 miles of thru-hiking experience headed to the Oregon Coast Trail to test ultralight tents over five days in late April. The tents in our test ranged from UL mainstays like Zpacks, Gossamer Gear, and Six Moons to freestanding options from major-league brands like MSR, Big Agnes, and NEMO. We also tested tents from top backpack hunting gear companies, including KUIU, Stone Glacier, and Seek Outside as well as relative newcomers like Durston and Samaya.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n On our multi-day section hike of the Oregon Coast Trail, we tested ultralight tents in as many configurations as possible: different terrains, weather conditions, and testers with different levels of experience. We experimented setting up the tents with nothing more than our wits and what was provided, but we also watched manufacturer instruction videos on loop to get it just so.\u00a0<\/p>\n Each ultralight tent was evaluated in three categories and given a score of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) from each tester. Weight was also independently verified and based on what you need to carry to set up the tent that is not dual purpose (like a trekking pole). After discussing the scores and relative merits of each ultralight tent, we then determined and agreed upon the awards as a group. The categories were:\u00a0<\/p>\n While we did grade for protection and condensation, we ultimately chose not to include those rankings here. We had very good weather during the window we were testing along the Oregon Coast. However, we did deal with condensation in the tents, due to the comparatively cool temperatures and high humidity along the coast. At night, you could see the droplets of water in the air with your headlamp. Within an hour of being pitched, the interior walls of every tent was wet, even before the tester got inside. We have included our notes below on how that condensation affected the gear inside our tents, but were unable to determine the comparative ability of each tent to vent under these conditions.\u00a0<\/p>\n For this test, we looked primarily at one-person shelters, and have noted the dimensions and overall usable space for the one-person version of each model, as well as when a two- or three-person model is available.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n The Gossamer Gear The One is the total package. It\u2019s easy to set up, even for first-time ultralight tent users. It\u2019s very light (third lightest in our test). It has enough head room to move around comfortably in the morning. The vestibule fit all our gear with room to spare. It packs up small. It even had an interior pocket stow pocket for odds and ends like eyeglasses. Check. Check. Check.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n But this is the real reason it won the top slot: The Gossamer Gear The One, more than any other tent in our test, just had that je ne sais quoi <\/em>that we look for in our home on the trail. Our testers wanted to be in this tent at the end of the day and were happy to wake up in it in the morning\u2014even our tallest tester at 5 foot 10 inches. There was more wrangling to be the next tester for this tent than of any other we looked at.<\/p>\n Even though the Gossamer Gear The One wasn\u2019t the lightest ultralight tent in our test (see our take on the Zpacks Solo Plex below), the upsides for that extra 6.7 ounces (better night\u2019s sleep, more headspace, easier setup, zip at the door to protect against wind and rain) will be worth it to everyone but the most dedicated gram counters.\u00a0<\/p>\n Both testers who took this tent out reported that they were able to figure out how to set up the tent without directions (something that was decidedly not true for all the ultralight tents in our test). However, they both noted the lack of directions provided in the package\u2014consider downloading these to your smartphone before heading out into the field.<\/p>\n The only downside to this tent is that it requires two trekking poles to set up, making it less weight-conscious for backpackers who don\u2019t already have trekking poles as part of their set up.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n Consider us the newest members of the Dan Durston fan club. When set up correctly, the Durston X-Mid 1 had some of the best geometry of anything we looked at, fully taut and secure against wind and rain, not sagging in the slightest when serious moisture sets in. Even when it wasn\u2019t set up perfectly (a loose stake popped on my first night in this tent), it was shockingly stable: I didn\u2019t even notice until morning.<\/p>\n Even though the rainfly was soaked from the unrelenting condensation of the Oregon Coast, I was completely dry in this tent, thanks to its double-wall setup. What makes the Durston X-Mid 1\u2019s double-wall set up especially unique is that it was designed to be pitched fly first\u2014no additional groundsheet required. This is such a preferable order of operations in inclement weather that I hope this becomes the norm in the future. Our testers also noticed that the pitch had steeper walls than was typical, which maximizes livability\u2014even if it doesn\u2019t technically give you more floor space.\u00a0<\/p>\n The Durston X-Mid 1 even had two doors and two vestibules. What one-person ultralight tent has a vestibule for your gear and a totally separate side for you to exit on for a midnight bathroom break? As far as we know, the Durston X-Mid 1 is the only one. This was also, along with the Tarptent Protrail, one of the lowest priced options in our test. Even though it\u2019s a similar weight to the other double-wall ultralight tents we looked at, the Durston X-Mid 1 is (at the time of this review) about $200 less expensive. Hiker trash: this one is a no-brainer.\u00a0<\/p>\n So what\u2019s wrong with this tent? To start: it\u2019s not your lightest option. For the same weight as the Durston X-Mid 1, you could get a fully freestanding tent. (Durston does offer a 1-pound version of this tent in DCF, but the price point for that is up there with the Zpacks Solo Plex.) Its setup also proved challenging for testers accustomed to freestanding tents: If this is your first trekking pole tent, give yourself some time and space to play around with perfecting the setup.\u00a0<\/p>\n Finally, you remember I mentioned a stake popped out the first night we used this tent? That stake had bent while being pushed into reasonably soft ground. I\u2019d plan to replace them with one of the best tent stakes<\/a>, with an eye toward MSR Groundhog minis<\/a> or Big Agnes Dirt Daggers.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n A freestanding tent that comes in under 2 pounds? If you are wondering what the catch is, so were we. Setting up the MSR Freelite was extremely fast (one tester set it up in under two minutes without having ever used it before), and it took minimal effort to achieve the storm-worthy profile. The interior, while not exactly spacious, was large enough for the biggest sleeping pad on our test (a full-size rectangular Therm-a-Rest NeoAir Xlite NXT<\/a>), with a backpack fitting handily into the vestibule. Testers reported that it felt larger than it was, which is an important detail if you get stuck inside waiting out a storm. The mesh and fly were extremely lightweight and plenty robust, with the dirt falling right off when we shook it out before stuffing it away for the day. The poles (best-in-class DACs, naturally) were even made from aluminum, as opposed to splinter-prone carbon fiber. Our only concern was with that 15D bathtub floor\u2014it may benefit from a groundsheet on more challenging terrains\u2014but this was strictly theoretical as we didn\u2019t experience any holes on our testing trip.\u00a0<\/p>\n While there are plenty of thru-hikers who will prefer the weight savings of a single-wall tent, the extreme condensation of the Oregon Coast showed the advantages of a double-wall setup. While the rest of our testing team was carefully packing up for the day, avoiding the soaked sides of their single-walled tents lest they unleash a rainstorm on their sleep system, the tester in the MSR Freelite 1 could sit up, bump their head on the mesh at the top of the tent, and stay dry.\u00a0<\/p>\n There are only a few small quibbles with this tent. One is the door: It\u2019s on the small side compared to the rest of our field, forcing our tallest tester (5 foot, 10 inches) to pretzel her limbs more than she would have liked when getting out. The included stakes (needle stakes) are also lower quality compared to other options in the MSR arsenal. Consider upgrading to either the lightweight MSR Carbon Cores<\/a> or the MSR Groundhog Minis, which have great holding power.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n Maybe you\u2019re like me: You don\u2019t typically use trekking poles while hiking, but you\u2019ve been known to toss one into your pack for gnarly river crossings or for extra stability on steep, snowy terrain. But there\u2019s no way you\u2019d carry two just to use in a trekking pole setup\u2014at that point you might as well just use a freestanding model.\u00a0<\/p>\n The Six Moons Lunar Solo was one of the few ultralight tents in our test that used one trekking pole in its design rather than two. The result was a modified teepee structure that was surprisingly intuitive to set up. Despite having never used this tent, I was able to put it up in only a couple of minutes with no directions.\u00a0<\/p>\n It also had a few details I appreciated. The first was a vent on the top of the tent. It didn\u2019t help with the unrelenting fog of the Oregon Coast, but in drier climes it would reduce condensation buildup from exhaling inside your tent. It also had a tension adjustment for the rainfly door inside the tent, a thoughtful detail that I haven\u2019t seen before. This would allow you to get rid of excess slack (typically caused by wind or condensation) in the part of the tent covering your gear without having to get out of your tent.<\/p>\n While the peak height of this tent is sufficient, I found it difficult to avoid bumping my head against the condensation-soaked tent walls in the morning. This was in part due to my site location: I was pitched on slightly uneven ground, which made it difficult to achieve the steeply sloped walls that would have been possible on flat ground.\u00a0<\/p>\n While this tent is affordably priced, note that the price does not include stakes; you\u2019ll need to purchase those separately. (See our take on the best tent stakes<\/a> for some ideas.)\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n I suspect I\u2019m not alone when I say the idea of a so-called hot tent\u2014a tent paired with a wood-burning stove\u2014took some getting used to. Like most backpackers, I\u2019m typically boiling water for my morning coffee in the vestibule while warily eyeing the explicit all-caps instructions to not use a stove in the tent. Starting an actual wood-burning fire in the tent would be out of the question. So it was with trepidation and a whole lot of excitement that I carted the Seek Outside Cimarron out for the third night of the Oregon Coast Trail testing trip.\u00a0<\/p>\n Verdict: It\u2019s great. First off, the Seek Outside Cimarron is an exceptionally easy tent to set up. The first step is to stake out the four corners of the tent, a task made easier by the long (almost 10 inches) twisted aluminum stakes\u2014I was comfortable pounding these in with a rock and they held significantly better than any other stakes provided for this test of the best ultralight tents. Then simply assemble the pole sections together at the lowest length setting, position it in the center of the tent, and adjust it up until it\u2019s at its highest setting. (The stove itself is a bit more complicated, but still straight-forward enough to assemble.)\u00a0<\/p>\n While Seek Outside markets this as a tent that will sleep two comfortably with the stove set up inside, my sense is that three careful hikers will do just fine. And all five of us fit comfortably chatting and eating in the tent at the end of the day.\u00a0<\/p>\n The only pitfall for this tent is that it can be a challenge to find a place for it. With the huge footprint and need to stake the tent down, you might spend more time searching for a spot to set up than actually setting up.<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n Plenty of people over 6 feet tall won\u2019t even look at a one-person ultralight tent. After all, the easiest way for manufacturers to save weight and protect your UL bonafides is to simply make your tent smaller than the competition. And, to be honest, our all-women testing crew, which topped out at 5 foot 10, was mostly fine with that. But there was one ultralight tent we tried that was clearly built with an over six-foot individual in mind: the Tarptent Protrail.<\/p>\n While plenty of other ultralight tents claim a similar 84-inch length, few actually have that much usable space, due to the taper of the walls. Not so in the Tarptent Protrail, which has fully vertical sides at the top and the bottom of the tent. We think that anyone up to six foot four would be comfortable lying down inside this tent.\u00a0<\/p>\n Unfortunately, getting in is a different story. The Tarptent Protrail was the only tent in our test that had head-in entry, which most testers found to be somewhat uncomfortable and awkward to use, especially when they were tired after a long day of hiking.\u00a0<\/p>\n The two trekking poles used in the setup of the Tarptent Protrail were separated lengthwise, 84 inches from one another. That long profile, without any additional support or structure in the center, meant that it sagged more from the condensation than anything else we looked at. We would also have concerns about this tent in serious wind conditions if it was angled incorrectly or if wind was coming from multiple directions.\u00a0<\/p>\n It\u2019s worth noting that shorter people will struggle to set up this tent, as one of our testers discovered on the final night of our trip along the Oregon Coast Trail. That\u2019s because the front trekking pole must be held upright at the same time as you stake out the far door: the wingspan of a shorter individual just can\u2019t reach that far.\u00a0<\/p>\n While the Tarptent Protrail wasn\u2019t our favorite ultralight tent from this test, there are a number of other models from Tarptent that utilize side entry and trekking-pole-free setup that we hope to check out on future tests.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n Our testers had more mixed feelings about the Zpacks Plex Solo than anything else we looked at. The weight of this tent\u2014the only one in our test to break the sub-one-pound barrier\u2014is incredibly impressive. It\u2019s also pretty darn expensive: twice the price of our best overall pick. The Dyneema Composite Fabric (DCF) that helps give this tent its low weight was also surprisingly insulative, with our tester noting that it was easily 5 degrees warmer inside than out. Nonetheless, if the pitch wasn\u2019t just so, it felt, in the words of one tester, like \u201csleeping inside of a wet trash bag.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n The incorrect pitch was not for lack of trying. Our tester, who described the provided instructions as some of the best we looked at, spent a long time trying to get this one right. But then she\u2019d get into the tent and realize something wasn\u2019t quite right with one or more of the ten stakes. After getting out to adjust the stakes and the guylines, she\u2019d get in again, and see that now something new was wrong. By morning, she was pretty frustrated, but other members of the testing trip who had used Zpacks before simply nodded sagely. The pitch on these tents is tough to master.\u00a0<\/p>\n We also had concerns about its storm-readiness. Unlike other ultralight tents, there is no zipper on the door, just clips at the corners of the two sides that secure to a stake. That means rain and wind can both push their way through if you haven\u2019t protected yourself by some other means. Experienced thru-hikers will know if this is a risk they are willing to take. After all, some trails are unlikely to see conditions that would make this an issue, and there is always the option to prop your backpack up in the door to provide some extra protection. But we think typical backpackers should think twice before committing to a setup like this.\u00a0<\/p>\n If you\u2019re new to ultralight tents, especially if you\u2019re new to trekking pole tents, we think you should shelve this one for the time being and opt for a slightly heavier model like the Six Moons Lunar Solo. But if you\u2019ve been using ultralight tents for some time, and are ready to upgrade to that elusive sub-10 pound kit, then this should absolutely be on your short list.\u00a0<\/p>\n Like the Six Moons Lunar Solo, this one doesn\u2019t come with stakes\u2014you\u2019ll need to buy those separately. While our first recommendation is for the MSR Groundhog Minis, that\u2019s going to push you up over the one pound mark. To keep this under a pound in total weight (and get all ten stakes\u2014you\u2019ll need them to take full advantage of the interior space), go for the MSR Carbon Core.\u00a0<\/p>\n The last note is to check your current trekking poles. The best pitch is achieved with a pole set to 132 cm in length, but some poles don\u2019t extend that far.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n In recent years there\u2019s been growing awareness that what goes into creating these practically weightless waterproof tent fabrics isn\u2019t always great for the environment. If this is starting to weigh on you (it\u2019s starting to weigh on us), then the NEMO OSMO series is one to seriously consider.\u00a0<\/p>\n NEMO is one of the backpacking gear companies leading the charge in creating more environmentally sustainable fabrics and processes. Their OSMO tent fabric is made from 100 percent recycled material (a composite of polyester and nylon) and achieves an impressive water repellency without the use of PFAS.<\/p>\n The NEMO Hornet OSMO is a freestanding tent that holds its own in the ultralight arena. It was just a couple of ounces heavier than the other freestanding tents we looked at (the Big Agnes Tiger Wall UL and MSR Freelite), with similar interior space and ease of setup. If you\u2019re looking to reduce your impact on the environment, this is a great option that will keep your backpacking kit ultralight.<\/p>\n The testers loved the Big Agnes Tiger Wall UL<\/a>\u2014another freestanding mainstay of the thru-hiking world\u2014for its easy setup, protected interior, spacious vestibule, and mesh storage pockets.\u00a0<\/p>\n While the MSR Freelite squeaked by with the lowest weight of the freestanding tents (and is our recommended pick for this category), the Big Agnes Tiger Wall UL is an excellent ultralight option.<\/p>\n
\n Published May 10, 2023 6:45 PM
\n <\/span>\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n
**Price including the cost of stakes (not included in the purchase price) Laura Lancaster<\/i><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nHow We Evaluated the Best Ultralight Tents<\/h2>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/group-photo-brightened.jpg\")
![\"From](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/three-of-the-best-ultralight-tents.jpg\")
\n
![\"Some](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/all-of-the-best-ultralight-tents.jpg\")
The Best Ultralight Tents of 2023: Reviews & Recommendations<\/h2>\n
Best Overall: Gossamer Gear The One<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/Gossamer-Gear-The-One.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\nReport Card\u00a0<\/h4>\n
\n
Key Features<\/h4>\n
\n
Pros<\/h4>\n
\n
Cons<\/h4>\n
\n
![\"Packing](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/testing-gg-the-one.jpg\")
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/inside-gg-the-one.jpg\")
Best Value: Durston X-Mid 1<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/Durston-X-Mid-1.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\nReport Card\u00a0<\/h4>\n
\n
Key Features<\/h4>\n
\n
Pros<\/h4>\n
\n
Cons<\/h4>\n
\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/inside-of-durston.jpg\")
![\"Jac](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/durston-setup.jpg\")
![\"While](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/durston-drooping-setup.jpg\")
![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/durston-stakes.jpg\")
Best Freestanding: MSR Freelite<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"MSR](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/MSR-Freelite.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\nReport Card\u00a0<\/h4>\n
\n
Key Features<\/h4>\n
\n
Pros<\/h4>\n
\n
Cons<\/h4>\n
\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/MSR-inside.jpg\")
Best Single Pole Setup: Six Moons Lunar Solo<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/Six-Moons-Lunar-Solo.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\nReport Card\u00a0<\/h4>\n
\n
Key Features<\/h4>\n
\n
Pros<\/h4>\n
\n
Cons<\/h4>\n
\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/six-moons-seam-sealing.jpg\")
![\"Being](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/six-moons-guy-line.jpg\")
![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/six-moons-condensation.jpg\")
Best for Groups: Seek Outside Cimarron<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/Seek-Outside-Cimarron.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\nReport Card\u00a0<\/h4>\n
\n
Key Features<\/h4>\n
\n
Pros<\/h4>\n
\n
Cons<\/h4>\n
\n
![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/seek-outside-titanium-stove.jpg\")
![\"Poking](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/cimarron-stove-pipe.jpg\")
![\"Even](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/seek-outside-cimarron-inside.jpg\")
Best for Tall People: Tarptent Protrail<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/tarptent-pc.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\nReport Card\u00a0<\/h4>\n
\n
Key Features<\/h4>\n
\n
Pros<\/h4>\n
\n
Cons<\/h4>\n
\n
![\"Our](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/tarptent-setup.jpg\")
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/Tarptent-Protrail.jpg\")
![\"One](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/setting-up-tarptent.jpg\")
Lightest: Zpacks Plex Solo<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/09\/zpacks.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\nReport Card\u00a0<\/h4>\n
\n
Key Features<\/h4>\n
\n
Pros<\/h4>\n
\n
Cons<\/h4>\n
\n
![\"Our](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/10\/zpacks-pitch.jpg\")
![\"One](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/10\/zpacks-condensation.jpg\")
![\"Second](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/10\/zpacks-pitch-2.jpg\")
Best Eco-Friendly: NEMO Hornet OSMO<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/10\/NEMO-Hornet-OSMO.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\nReport Card\u00a0<\/h4>\n
\n
Key Features<\/h4>\n
\n
Pros<\/h4>\n
\n
Cons<\/h4>\n
\n
The Rest of the Field<\/h2>\n
![\"We](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/10\/Big-Agnes.jpg\")
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/10\/outdoor-vitals.jpg\")
![\"It](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/05\/10\/stone-glacier.jpg\")