\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
15 June 2023<\/em><\/p>\n Dear Speaker McCarthy, Minority Leader Jefferies, Majority Leader Schumer, and Minority Leader McConnell,<\/p>\n We the undersigned sheriffs, peace officers, and law enforcement officials urge Congress to vote on H. J. Res. 44 and S. J. Res. 20 to reject the unconstitutional ban on up to 40,000,000 pistols as enacted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) on June 1st<\/sup>.<\/p>\n ATF cannot simply restrict access to pistols because a stabilizing brace has been attached\u2014they are essential to the exercise of the Second Amendment by Americans with disability. According to the Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller, <\/em>every American has an individual right to keep a handgun inside the home.[i]<\/a> And a federal judge in the Seventh Circuit recently affirmed:<\/p>\n [B]races are needed by certain individuals with disabilities to operate a firearm. Thus, arm braces are an integral part of the meaningful exercise of Second Amendment rights for such individuals and can also be considered an \u201carm.\u201d It is uncontroverted that law-abiding members of society, including the elderly, infirmed, and disabled, have the constitutional right to arm themselves for self-defense.[ii]<\/a><\/p>\n While ATF is a federal law enforcement agency, it has no authority to enact such a gun ban. Furthermore, ATF agents have no authority to seize pistol braced weapons because they are protected by the Second Amendment. As constitutionally minded law enforcement, we recognize and fully respect the right of the People to keep and bear arms free from infringement\u2014including any pistol with an attached stabilizing brace.<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n As Representative Paul Gosar said so well, if Congress allows \u201cthis rule to pass without lifting a finger\u201d it will \u201cdishonor law enforcement\u201d which it recently sought to commemorate during Police Week.[iii]<\/a> Indeed, we agree with the Congressman that:<\/p>\n Few things would do greater harm to the thin blue line between law enforcement and the civilians they are charged to protect and serve. This rule would pit peaceful Americans against officers obligated to enforce this rule. No officer should be put into the position to confiscate pistol brace firearms from peaceful civilians who legally purchased them. What officer wants to carry on their conscience that they imprisoned unaware, physically disabled members of their community? If an objector\u2019s concern is public safety, then know enforcement of this rule will only endanger the American citizenry.[iv]<\/a><\/p>\n As constitutionally minded law enforcement, we affirm that we do not wish to be pitted against the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.<\/u><\/strong> More than half the country has passed Second Amendment Sanctuary laws prohibiting the enforcement of such new federal gun laws.[v]<\/a> In some states, law enforcement is explicitly prohibited from working with ATF to violate the Second Amendment or enforce new federal gun controls under these sanctuary laws.[vi]<\/a> And on May 25th<\/sup>, 27 state Attorneys General wrote to Congress condemning the Biden Pistol Ban and urging Congress to vote to overturn it.[vii]<\/a><\/p>\n Attorneys General and private organizations like Gun Owners of America are fighting this in court and we will protect gun owners in our jurisdictions, but it is time for Congress to act. <\/u><\/strong>We the undersigned sheriffs, peace officers, and law enforcement officers urge the passage of H. J. Res. 44 and S. J. Res. 20 immediately, to protect the people from this unconstitutional gun ban and preserve the Second Amendment rights of the people.<\/p>\n Sincerely,<\/p>\n