We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn More \u203a<\/span><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n \n Laser rangefinding binoculars answer two essential questions of most hard-core hunters and shooters: What is it? And how far is it?<\/p>\n But the best rangefinder binoculars for 2023 add so much more those the answers. They\u2019re among our most impressive integrations of optics and electronics, with an extra dash of software and real-world durability on the side.<\/p>\n These units can not only render distant details clearly and with enough resolution that you can count antler points or bullseye-target rings, but they also provide aiming solutions, either from on-board software or by connecting to a mobile-phone app that lets shooters customize holds to their specific bullet and ballistics. Some even integrate environmental data, like wind speed and direction, elevation, temperature, and barometric pressure to the shooting solution.<\/p>\n Because this is such an energetic sector of the optics industry, we wanted to test new-for-the-year products against each other, but also against the OGs of the category. So we put out a call for new-model LRF binoculars, but we used three legacy products as the baseline for adequate performance. Those legacy LRF binos are Vortex\u2019s affordable (around $1,100) Fury HD 5000, the venerable EL Range from Swarovski, which retails for around $3,500, and the excellent Zeiss Victory RF, which sells for close to $4,000. If you\u2019re interested in seeing how these three products, all a few years old now, stack up against each other, scroll down to the previously tested LRF binos from 2019.<\/p>\n We undoubtedly missed some solid products for the 2023 edition of our test, and because we did our testing in early August, we probably missed some late introductions. However, our field of seven new rangefinder binoculars covers the landscape from simple to complex, and from the affordable to the expensive.<\/p>\n Laser rangefinding binoculars have to pull double duty. Much more so than LRF monoculars, binoculars are intended as optical instruments. They must be able to render distant targets clearly and in all sorts of light conditions. But their ranging capabilities are equally important. Do they deliver fast and consistently precise distances to targets? Can they also inform a shot based on ballistic software, whether on-board the binocular or delivered via connection to a mobile app?<\/p>\n We put all those capabilities to the test in our field evaluations. We measure units\u2019 best far and close distances at targets ranging from barns to grass, trees, and even deer (though occasionally we used Angus cows as surrogates for deer). We assess their target modes, their optical clarity and brightness, and the visibility of the display in changing light conditions and backgrounds. We further determine whether caliber-specific software is intuitive and useful. And we assess units\u2019 price, warranty, and amenities. We test the maximum and minimum range, and use every targeting mode and menu option. We mount binoculars on tripods to get rock-solid ranging, and we take the units in the field, deploying them both methodically and rapidly at targets of various sizes and distances. And then we pair them to a slave rifle and a ballistic app and judge their ability to improve our shooting accuracy.<\/p>\n We break our 10-point scoring into four general categories: ranging performance, display and optics, features, and value. The average of these categories is the basis of our grades, detailed below.<\/p>\n Ranging performance includes both the maximum and minimum distances the unit is capable of ranging, but also ranging precision and ability to repeatedly range objects of various sizes and textures. The performance score also considers various targeting modes. Display and optics assesses how well the unit \u201csees\u201d targets, how useful and adjustable the display is to each users\u2019 eyesight and different light conditions, and reticle utility. The feature grade assesses whether the unit connects to a mobile app, or contains a ballistic library, or has on-board sensors. Lastly, our value grade is a measure of whether the LRF binocular is worth its price, and considers its peer group, warranty, and amenities like a harness or carrying case.<\/p>\n The laser rangefinding binocular that gets the highest overall score wins our Editor\u2019s Choice award for the best in the category; the optic with the highest price\/value score wins our Great Buy recognition. We also assigned other awards for specific noteworthy attributes.<\/p>\n Our 10-point evaluation adds up to a total numeric score, but we translate those to grades for each submission. Our Ranging Performance grade combines the scores from ranging, accuracy, sensitivity, and processor speed. Our Display\/Optics grade aggregates both display and optical quality scores. The Features grade considers amenities, connectivity, and versatility. And then the Price\/Value grade is our value grade, which also considers durability.<\/p>\n To earn an \u201cExcellent\u201d grade, the average of that category must be 9 or higher, which is extremely hard to achieve. \u201cVery Good\u201d is an average score of 7 to 9. A \u201cGood\u201d grade is 5 to 7. Our \u201cFair\u201d grade is 3 to 25, and \u201cPoor\u201d is anything under 3.<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n Score Card<\/strong><\/p>\n Key Features<\/strong><\/p>\n Pros<\/strong><\/p>\n Cons<\/strong><\/p>\n Given the trend to pack as much electronic power into a laser rangefinding binocular as possible, Leupold\u2019s long-awaited entry in the category is relatively primitive. The new BX-4 Range is essentially Leupold\u2019s RX rangefinding monocular repackaged as a very good binocular. It doesn\u2019t have a Bluetooth connection to a ballistics mobile app. It doesn\u2019t contain a compass or GPS transponder that will help you find your way home.<\/p>\n But the BX-4 Range is one of the most capable LRF binoculars in our test, performing basic ranging and aiming tasks with minimum fuss, and delivering excellent optical clarity as an important bonus, since these devices are used primarily for viewing.<\/p>\n The Leupold\u2019s interface is fast and intuitive. Users can choose either the company\u2019s patented TBR\/W (it stands for True Ballistic Range and is Leupold\u2019s angle-adjusted mode), bow mode (a shorter-distance angle-adjusted mode), line-of-sight mode, or add a wind hold for longer shots. Further, the unit includes 25 ballistic groups so rifle shooters can match distance-adjusted holds to the bullet dynamics of their loads. That\u2019s about it. The BX-4 Range does not include Leupold\u2019s arrow-flight software, called Flightpath.<\/p>\n The unit will express holds in angle-adjusted ranges, or holdover in either MILs, MOA, or inches\/centimeters. We ranged deer-sized targets out to about 1,250 yards, farther than the advertised range, and ranged reflective targets at 2,800 yards. The minimum range we recorded was about 12 yards.<\/p>\n I took a prototype BX-4 Range<\/a> on a mule deer hunt in Mexico, and experienced the speed and simplicity of the unit in the dense brush of the Sonoran Desert. The 10\u00d742 unit performed on par with Leupold\u2019s non-ranging BX-4 Pro Guide binocular, with very good edge clarity and decent field-of-view, both important features when scanning both tight cover and distant viewscapes for big Sonoran bucks. Shot opportunities are fast and fleeting in the desert, and the BX-4 Range performed admirably in these snap-shot situations. The circular reticle in the Leupold is fast and intuitive, and I found I didn\u2019t have to hunt and peck for ranges.<\/p>\n The ranging engine is lightning fast, on par with units from Sig, which has previously been the undisputed speed champion of this category. Leupold\u2019s TBR software is accurate and proven, and the addition of wind holds gives long-range shooters plenty of tools, though competition shooters will probably want to link to custom ballistics software through a mobile app, which isn\u2019t possible with the BX-4.<\/p>\n We recorded a few demerits, both in the field in Mexico and later during our testing. First, the unit is the size and heft of a brick; it\u2019s an ungraceful handful. The closed-bridge design makes it difficult to use with a single hand, though Leupold has thoughtfully made the button operation ambidextrous. The optical coatings that make the red OLED display pop tend to throw a blue-green veil over images. You get used to it after a bit, but it can be distracting. The display has only three intensity settings; we\u2019d like to see an auto-brightness feature in subsequent models. And testers felt that the unit was overpriced, given the fairly spartan features.<\/p>\n It should be noted that, while many sources will cite this as Leupold\u2019s entry into the LRF binocular category, we tested the brand\u2019s first unit as far back as 2019. This latest entry is manufactured by the Czech brand Meopta, but Leupold has smartly loaded its proprietary software inside an optically superior binocular, bringing both new-world and old-world talents to the shooting and long-range (or at least mid-range) hunting game.<\/p>\n For a fast, capable rangefinder housed in an excellent binocular, and backed by Leupold\u2019s legendary customer service, we conclude that this is an excellent \u201cfreshman\u201d effort, and worth the wait for Leupold\u2019s re-entry into this dynamic category.<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n Score Card<\/strong><\/p>\n Key Features<\/strong><\/p>\n Pros<\/strong><\/p>\n Cons<\/strong><\/p>\n You may be attracted to this exceptional rangefinding binocular by the price, but you should appreciate its abundant features, especially if you\u2019re an archery or whitetail hunter looking for a great deal on a mid-range model.<\/p>\n Its compact 32mm frame makes it a natural choice for tight-quarters hunting in a treestand or ground blind, and it easily handles with a single hand. A free firmware update gives you Sig\u2019s Archery Mode, which compensates for extreme angles at the distances bowhunters regularly encounter.<\/p>\n But the Sig\u2019s diminutive size\u2014it\u2019s also available in a 10\u00d742 version\u2014shouldn\u2019t fool you. There\u2019s a ton of both optical and ballistic horsepower in this 26-ounce, 5-inch marvel.<\/p>\n For starters, the KILO6K connects to Sig\u2019s excellent BDX app, and tethers to BDX-compatible riflescopes and LRF monoculars. Under the hood of the 10\u00d732 binocular, the unit carries Applied Ballistics Ultralite software, which delivers bullet-specific ranges out to 800 yards. And when connected to an external device, the unit can run on AP Xtended Range, which provides range-adjusted holds out as far as you can shoot. The unit also connects to the BaseMaps app, which is useful for dropping location-specific waypoints. The KILO6K has a programmable display and pairs with Garmin and Kestrel environmental sensors.<\/p>\n So much for its brains. How about its brawn? Every tester noted a distracting blue distortion, evidence of optical coatings designed to boost the red OLED display. In terms of ranging acumen, we were able to get about half the stated value on a variety of targets in bright sunlight; we fared a little better in low-light conditions. Some testers wanted a configurable reticle, noting that the circle is overly large and takes up too much of the field of view on distant targets.<\/p>\n The Sig ships with one of the best harnesses in our collection, and every tester noted the tremendous value they deliver for about $1,100.<\/p>\n \u201cAs a [precision rimfire] match director, I found this to be an extremely useful unit when connected to the BaseMaps app,\u201d noted Gibson. \u201cI can quickly plan where to place targets and have the distances easily added to my match book.\u201d<\/p>\n With the addition of Sig\u2019s Archery Mode software, the handy size, and the huge amount of both optical and ballistic capability in the diminutive binocular, this is possibly the perfect laser rangefinding binocular for archery, whitetail hunters, and target shooters who don\u2019t intend to engage targets beyond about 2,000 yards. It\u2019s the overwhelming pick for our Great Buy award, and came very close to taking our Editor\u2019s Choice award, as well as the test\u2019s top rangefinding binocular.<\/p>\n Read Next<\/strong>: Best Binoculars for Hunting<\/a><\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n Score Card<\/strong><\/p>\n Key Features<\/strong><\/p>\n Pros<\/strong><\/p>\n Cons<\/strong><\/p>\n There\u2019s a new player in the long-range shooting and hunting game. Revic, the optics arm of the long-range rifle company Gunwerks, has come out with a rangefinding binocular that packages all the excellent ballistics capability of its LRF monocular in a sharp and useful field optic. The Acura BLR10b allows shooters to connect via Bluetooth to the Revic Ops app, or to use on-board ballistics and wind solutions to make shots at truly impressive distances in challenging conditions.<\/p>\n The Revic does so many things so well that it lost to the excellent Leupold by a single point for our best rangefinding binocular award. Because it\u2019s configured so purposefully for long-range shooting, it gets our nod for the best long-ranger of the test. And it\u2019s a unit you should consider as you look at the other ballistically superior LRF binoculars on the market: Sig\u2019s exceptional KILO10K, Leica\u2019s Geovid Pro, and the Vortex Fury 5000 AB.<\/p>\n On the basis of measurable attributes, the ranging sensitivity of the Revic Acura is on par with those of Sig and Leupold, which is to say excellent, though testers noted that the Revic\u2019s speed is noticeably slower than its peers. Its glass is a touch better than the Leupold\u2019s, as measured by our resolution and low-light assessments. And its interface with the excellent Revic Ops ballistic app is very good.<\/p>\n Among the attributes that elevated the Acura: its twin wind modes, its three holdover notations, and its ability to connect to an external Kestrel or Garmin without slowing down its processor. That last attribute is worth dwelling on. Many rangefinders operate at lightning speed when deploying on-board ballistics software, but tend to run slower and drain batteries when connected to an external device. The Revic slowed slightly when we connected it to both the mobile app and a Kestrel meter, but not tragically.<\/p>\n Tester Kyle Gibson noted the easy exchange of information between the Revic Ops app and the Acura unit.<\/p>\n \u201cI was impressed with how quickly and easily I was able to build different [ballistic] profiles in the app and move them to the LRF,\u201d Gibson noted.<\/p>\n The wind notations are useful. Use either the on-board wind inputs for horizontal range-adjusted holdoff values, or input a vector wind to get the full suite of wind holds, including spin drift, aerodynamic jump, and Coriolis effect. Holdovers are delivered in either MIL, MOA, or Revic\u2019s own \u201cShoot-to-Range\u201d hold that informs dial values for a ballistic turret to deliver a bullet at a specific range.<\/p>\n We also liked the ergonomics of the compact, short, and lithe unit. And for testers who have priced the Revic\u2019s peers, the $2,700 price tag is a relative bargain for the ballistic and optical horsepower it delivers.<\/p>\n The unit lost points in ranging distance; on our test field we couldn\u2019t quite get half its stated value of 5,000 yards. And some testers complained about sluggish returns, including a full second delay for some distant readings.<\/p>\n \u201cSeems like this is a unit that\u2019s made for a very specific use case,\u201d wrote one tester. \u201cOverall good and limited use, but glass is not better than the Leica [Geovid Pro] and is much slower than the Sig.\u201d<\/p>\n We noticed some edge distortion and low-light performance was in the middle of the pack. Some testers had trouble with erratic auto-intensity settings on the display. But those are fairly minor quibbles that don\u2019t degrade the Acura\u2019s main job, which is to get long-range shooters on target quickly and confidently. And for a fair price, considering its prodigious talents.<\/p>\n Read Next<\/strong>: Best Binocular Harnesses<\/a> <\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n Score Card<\/strong><\/p>\n Key Features<\/strong><\/p>\n Pros<\/strong><\/p>\n Cons<\/strong><\/p>\n It\u2019s interesting that Leica led with the sized-down 10\u00d732 version of this excellent rangefinding binocular. The smaller version of the Geovid Pro wowed our test team last year, and in some ways we wish Leica had stopped there. The 10\u00d732 Geovid Pro remains a high-water mark<\/a> for a rangefinding binocular\u2019s optical and ballistic capabilities.<\/p>\n With the 10\u00d742 version of the model, introduced earlier this year, Leica has added some optical horsepower\u2014the larger objective lens adds about 10 minutes to effective viewing in early morning and in late evening thanks to its better light transmission. But with its larger lenses and overall dimensions, it\u2019s given up the ergonomics and field-worthy capabilities of the smaller version.<\/p>\n The new Geovid Pro is an optical marvel. It easily won our low-light and resolution tests, and for users who mainly want a very good binocular, it\u2019s our consensus pick as the optics of our test. The open-bridge design allows for fair handling, but users longed for the quick deployment of the smaller Geovid Pro.<\/p>\n \u201cThis 10\u00d742 version feels like a battleship, compared to the speed-boat action of the 10\u00d732,\u201d said one tester. That\u2019s a fair assessment, though we also noted that the 10\u00d742 version is better suited to long-range competitions and many Western big-game hunting scenarios which rely on optical resolution.<\/p>\n Like its little brother, the 10\u00d742 is loaded with Applied Ballistics Ultralite<\/a> software, which provides adjusted aiming solutions out to 800 yards. If you want to go farther, connect to Leica\u2019s app for custom holds out to 2,000 yards, which derives aiming solutions from Applied Ballistics Xtended Range version. It\u2019s for those long targets that users will appreciate the fine optics of the 10\u00d742 model. One of the value propositions for the Leica is its tracking capability. Say you shoot a deer across a canyon. You can range the spot of the target, drop a waypoint, and then connect to a mapping app to have that specific shot captured, allowing you to walk to the spot of the shot, but then to track the animal across the landscape. It\u2019s a useful feature, though we had trouble with the stability of the connection between binocular and mobile app.<\/p>\n From a ranging perspective, testers appreciated the fast read of initial targets, but universally noted the slow reset of the ranging engine. Many wanted a scan mode to confirm distance of frustratingly slow or moving targets, and others noted the spendy price for a unit. But the Leica has the best optics of the test, and it\u2019s worth noting that the optically excellent 10\u00d742 Ultravid binocular sells for only about $1,000 less than the Geovid, and delivers none of the ballistic intelligence of the LRF binocular.<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n Score Card<\/strong><\/p>\n Key Features<\/strong><\/p>\n Pros<\/strong><\/p>\n Cons<\/strong><\/p>\n For those hunters and shooters who want an optically superior binocular but only a minimalist rangefinder, this is the unit for you. The Geovid R brings Leica\u2019s excellent glass and coatings to the game along with a rangefinder that will tell you the dead-level distance to your target, but that\u2019s about it. It doesn\u2019t have any ballistic functions, angle-adjusted ranging, or even targeting modes.<\/p>\n What\u2019s very interesting about this unit, and the detail that sets it apart from Leica\u2019s fully featured Geovid Pro, is that it doesn\u2019t pretend to be more than it is. This is essentially Leica\u2019s mid-level Trinovid binocular with a bare-bones rangefinder worked into its architecture. The price, around $1,400, is on par with the price of the Hawke and Burris laser rangefinding binoculars in our test, but the Leica brings way more optical performance to the game, even if its rangefinding talents are a little flat.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s talk about that rangefinding. The Geovid R gives you line-of-sight ranging at targets from about 10 yards, which we confirmed, out to about 1,800 yards, a little bit shy of the 2,000-yard advertised range. The red LED display is crisp and handy, and the ranging and mode buttons are easy to reach and to navigate.<\/p>\n But that\u2019s the extent of the Geovid R\u2019s ranging capabilities. Instead, this is a unit that leads with optical performance. It finished near the top of the field in both optical resolution and low-light performance, and testers noted its fine edge clarity and overall brightness, especially compared with peers that have such heavy optical coatings that images can appear washed out.<\/p>\n But testers also noted with concern the pedestrian ranging.<\/p>\n \u201cIt took forever to get from angle to distance modes,\u201d noted tester Luke Cocolli. \u201cOverall, the electronics seemed glacial compared with other units in our test.\u201d<\/p>\n Testers noted the sloppy focus wheel but applauded the locking eyecups. Overall, the Leica Geovid R was a mild hit with testers, who noted that it\u2019s the best of the optics-first rangefinders in our evaluation, and a very good value at about $1,400, given that it brings basic rangefinding to the viewing equation.<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n Score Card<\/strong><\/p>\n Key Features<\/strong><\/p>\n Pros<\/strong><\/p>\n Cons<\/strong><\/p>\n Along with the Burris and the Leica Geovid R, the Hawke is one of a line of bare-bones rangefinders conjoined with a fairly capable binocular. But, in the case of the Hawke, the rangefinder\u2019s performance exceeded our expectations while the optical performance disappointed testers.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s start with the rangefinder. Hawke advertises that the unit will stretch from 11 out to 1,200 yards, but we managed readings as close as 6 yards and way out to 1,970 yards, making us question the modesty of the advertised range. We also liked the repeatability of the rangefinder, and the precision, especially given the oversized circular reticle.<\/p>\n The ranging speed was on par with our expectations, and the modes\u2014the Frontier LRF includes last-target, near-target, fog, and hunt modes as well as both angle-adjusted and line-of-sight ranging modes\u2014are what we\u2019d expect for the type and price of unit. In this regard, it has all a hunter or shooter engaging targets at moderate distances needs. It doesn\u2019t connect to a ballistic app or have any on-board ballistics software.<\/p>\n The Hawke ships with a very good chest harness, and the binocular\u2014which is also available in a 10\u00d742 version\u2014is covered by one of the best warranties in the category.<\/p>\n But that\u2019s about the extent of the atta-boys. Optically, the Frontier LRF falls short. The unit finished near the bottom of our resolution and low-light assessments, and testers noted a good deal of peripheral blurring and washed out images in bright sunlight. Nearly every tester recorded eye strain, which limits the amount of time this LRF will be used in real-world conditions.<\/p>\n Overall, testers felt the Hawke was overpriced by a couple hundred dollars, but appreciated the full-featured rangefinder, especially compared with more optics-forward units like the Leica Geovid R.<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n Score Card<\/strong><\/p>\n Key Features<\/strong> <\/p>\n Pros<\/strong><\/p>\n Cons<\/strong><\/p>\n Call this a point-and-shoot laser rangefinding binocular. Like the Hawke and the Leica Geovid R, there are not a lot of bells or whistles to this unit from Burris, the first rangefinding binocular from the brand. You get all the modes (auto, sport, and hunt) and targeting (angle-adjusted and line-of-sight) that you might get with Burris\u2019s LRF monocular, but you get the added benefit of both-eyes viewing and the stability of a both-hands binocular.<\/p>\n For Burris\u2019s first foray into the category, the Signature LRF brings some noteworthy talent. Our testers reported very fast range readings and a bright display that had to be manually dimmed in low-light situations. Optically, the unit was a bit disappointing. Testers reported peripheral blurring and a washed-out image in most light conditions. The Burris finished dead last in our low-light rankings.<\/p>\n Electronically, the Burris performed almost exactly as advertised, though we weren\u2019t able to achieve the 2,600-yard stated range. Our maximum distance was about 1,400 yards, though we got readings as close as 7 yards. Testers liked the simple but capable rangefinder and its various modes, which include both line-of-sight and angle-adjusted ranging.<\/p>\n Shortcomings include the lack of ballistics-based aiming solutions. Unlike the Leupold, there are no on-board ballistics groups, and unlike the Sig, Revic, and Leica, there\u2019s no connection to a ballistic app. That limits its real-world utility to about 1,000 yards. Testers also complained about the stiff ranging button that took so much pressure that it pulled the unit off the target.<\/p>\n Still, for about $1,000, the Burris offers slightly more features than the Hawke, which costs more. The Signature LRF is a great entry-level LRF binocular for a hunter or medium-range shooter who simply needs to know the distance to the target, and can figure bullet-specific holds on their own.<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n This rangefinding bino does almost everything right. Its fluorite glass is among the best in the field. Its balance and ergonomics are so nimble and its profile so slim that it\u2019s hard to believe there\u2019s a laser and processor in its guts. Its ability to connect to a mobile app through Bluetooth was the final detail that pushed the Victory RF to our top spot of 11 units in our 2019 laser rangefinding binocular test.<\/p>\n The Zeiss is not quite perfect. The ranging button, out on the right-hand barrel, caused testers to lose their grip on the optic when activating the rangefinder. And the processor, especially in scanning mode, is slower than we\u2019d like. Also, it\u2019s very expensive (although the nonranging Victory binocular costs $2,800).<\/p>\n But the laser is powerful\u00ad\u2014we routinely ranged non-reflective targets to 2,100 yards\u2014and precise. The Zeiss has the full gamut of modes, and the mobile app allows users to load specific ballistics data in the Victory RF\u2019s brain.<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n Lightning-fast, fully compatible with SIG\u2019s BDX ballistics software, and extremely customizable, the KILO3000BDX is one of the most complete integrations of electronics and optics that we saw in 2019. <\/p>\n The Nikon, Vortex, and SIG ranging binoculars share many of the same internal components and exterior architecture (and price). The three share similar optical scores too. But the SIG stands alone in that it connects to a mobile app that allows users to download specific ballistics. Its laser is also more powerful. We ranged nonreflective targets out to 2,822 yards (2,312 to reflective targets), and the unit detected a greater variety and size of soft targets than its peers.<\/p>\n The unit features the full suite of modes, including angle-modified ranging, line-of-sight ranging, and range modified by information from Applied Ballistics\u2019 library of bullet dynamics.<\/p>\n Read Next: How We Test Hunting Optics<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n With its exceptional glass (it produced the best image in the test) and wonderful ergonomics, this Swarovski has been on the market for eight years. It\u2019s had some upgrades in that time, including the vivid orange armor of our sample, and some improvements to its laser and processor. But the \u201cbaby bump\u201d distensions on its belly remain, as does its relatively slow ranging speed.<\/p>\n The laser is adequate\u2014in 2019 we ranged reflective targets to 1,800 yards and nonreflective targets out to 1,600 yards\u2014but with a minimum distance of 33 yards, it\u2019s not ideal for bowhunters. We also liked its ability to match ranging with ballistics from a suite of caliber families, and its grippy open-hinge design.<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n From the company that pioneered rangefinding binoculars, this updated version of the venerable Geovid took the top spot for optical quality. Its ergonomics are also among the best in the test, with curvaceous lines and a very wide field of view defined by its revolutionary Perger Porro prism.<\/p>\n But its rangefinder hasn\u2019t quite kept up. The response time is slow, and while we managed to range distances out to 2,434 yards (the company claims 3,000 yards), the Leica is at its most precise on targets inside about 800 yards and as close as 10 yards. Modes include line of sight and angle compensation, plus it delivers holds that correspond to clicks on the turret of a riflescope.<\/p>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n This is an adequate rangefinder housed in a decent binocular, but the name may be a bit misleading. In our 2019 test, we managed to range reflective targets out to about 1,500 yards and nonreflective targets a bit beyond 1,200 yards. More impressive is its close-ranging capability. We ranged targets just inside 2 yards, making it an excellent choice for bowhunters.<\/p>\n
\n Published Sep 30, 2023 8:38 AM
\n <\/span>\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\nHow We Tested the Best Rangefinding Binoculars<\/h2>\n
How We Grade Laser Rangefinding Binoculars<\/h3>\n
Best Rangefinding Binoculars: Reviews and Recommendations <\/h2>\n
Best Overall: Leupold BX-4 Range TBR\/W 10\u00d742<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/09\/29\/best-overall-leupold-bx4-lr.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/08\/17\/IMG_0364-scaled.jpg\")
Best Value: Sig Sauer KILO6K 10\u00d732<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/09\/29\/Sig-Kilo6-Bino-lrf.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
![\"Binoculars](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/09\/29\/Binos-40-scaled.jpg\")
Best for Long Range: Revic Acura BLR10b<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"Revic](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/09\/29\/Revic-acura-blr.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
![\"Binoculars](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/09\/29\/Binos-46-scaled.jpg\")
Leica Geovid Pro 10\u00d742<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"Leica](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/09\/29\/leica-geovid-pro.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
![\"Binoculars](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/09\/29\/Binos-54-scaled.jpg\")
Leica Geovid R 10\u00d742<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"Leica](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/09\/29\/leica-geovid-r.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
![\"Binoculars](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/09\/29\/Binos-44-scaled.jpg\")
Hawke Frontier LRF 8\u00d742<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/09\/29\/Hawke-LRF.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
![\"Binoculars](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/09\/29\/Binos-18-scaled.jpg\")
Burris Signature LRF<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"Burris](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/09\/29\/burris-lrf.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
![\"Binoculars](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/09\/29\/Binos-13-scaled.jpg\")
Previously Tested Laser Rangefinder Binoculars<\/h2>\n
Zeiss Victory RF<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"Zeiss](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2019\/09\/03\/F36D7L6TCQFSOM5U54W77KIVKY.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\nSIG Sauer KILO3000BDX<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"SIG](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2019\/09\/03\/N6MXMGNJ47GMXO6VCHJCMJHAKY.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\nSwarovski EL Range<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"Swarovski](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2019\/09\/03\/WZASIZMVVCTWAZ73ZHKMCKC7HA.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\nLeica Geovid HD-B 3000<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"Leica](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2019\/09\/03\/LUYDTCJ46QTAXLNQIAGETP5RPQ.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\nVortex Fury HD5000<\/a><\/h3>\n
![\"Vortex](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2019\/09\/03\/QGOUZEY6CYGDDBIULVXXOTB6OE.jpg?auto=webp&width=800&crop=16:10,offset-x50\")
\n <\/figure>\n
![\"Binoculars](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/uploads\/2023\/09\/29\/Binos-21-scaled.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n