The Biden administration isn’t calling for dam breaching (yet) but a new agreement indicates its stance on a key issue for salmon restoration<\/p>\n
![\"snake](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/snake-river-dams-lower-granite_less_than_1mb.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Lower Granite Dam is the uppermost of the Lower Four Snake River Dams. It sits 40 miles downstream of Lewiston, Idaho. VW Pics \/ Getty<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Today the Biden administration took steps toward an ultimate goal of breaching the Lower Four Snake River Dams by announcing the U.S. government\u2019s intention to help replace the social and economic benefits currently provided by the dams. In an agreement with the States of Oregon and Washington and four Indian Tribes, the administration announced its support for the Columbia Basin Restoration Initiative<\/a>, which provides a foundation for recovering salmon, steelhead, and other wild fish populations in the Northwest.<\/p>\n \u201cToday\u2019s announcement from the Biden administration is a historic step towards repairing the harms done in the Snake Basin to salmon, steelhead, Columbia Basin Tribes, and anglers across the Pacific Northwest,\u201d American Rivers\u2019<\/a> Snake River director Kyle Smith tells Outdoor Life<\/em>. \u201cThere\u2019s still much work to do, but American Rivers applauds the administration for its leadership.\u201d<\/p>\n Crucially the agreement<\/a> made public on Dec. 14 is not a decision to breach the Lower Four Snake River Dams (LSRDs), nor does it support legislation to authorize dam breaching. The dams are owned by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and removing or redesigning them would require an act of Congress.\u00a0<\/p>\n The idea of breaching the four dams is deeply controversial<\/a>, since they provide several benefits to our modern, energy-hungry society, including hydropower, barge transportation, and irrigation. According to many experts and fisheries managers in the Northwest, however, they\u2019re also driving huge declines in wild anadromous fish stocks and hastening their extinction. Some of the fish native to the Snake River Basin are returning at less than two percent of their historical abundance, while other stocks native to the watershed have collapsed altogether. These declines have continued in the 50 years since the dams were built, even though the dams\u2019 operators have spent roughly $17 billion<\/a> in taxpayer dollars to try and compensate for their interference.<\/p>\n Proponents of dam breaching say the eight dams these fish must pass through on their migration to the ocean and back are four too many. As proof, they point to the lower number of fish that return to the Snake each year when compared to the fish that return to other Columbia River tributaries, which migrate through four or fewer federal dams on the mainstem Columbia. Advocates also view the Snake River\u2019s high-elevation tributary streams as the last stronghold for anadromous fish in a warming Lower 48, and contend that restoring a free-flowing lower Snake River is the best way to ensure that Pacific salmon, steelhead, and other native fish species can access these coldwater streams to spawn.<\/p>\n These claims have been the basis of a series of ongoing lawsuits<\/a> that have been filed against the dams\u2019 operators by a coalition of conservation groups, the states of Oregon and Washington, and several tribes since the 1990s. At their core, these suits argue that operators of the LSRDs have not done enough to save the Snake\u2019s wild salmon and steelhead from extinction. In 2021, the Biden administration issued a temporary stay on this litigation and became a third-party mediator in the discussions. The formal agreement made public on Dec. 14 is the culmination of this mediation work, and it includes a multi-year pause in litigation around the LSRDs.<\/p>\n \u201cThe science is clear,\u201d the agreement reads, \u201cand now so too must be our path forward.\u201d<\/p>\n That path forward will include millions of dollars in federal funding to develop a plan for replacing the hydropower generated by the dams with other sources of renewable energy. It establishes a Pacific Northwest Tribal Energy Program, which will help the four Columbia River Treaty Tribes \u2014 the Yakama Nation, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation, the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, and the Nez Perce Tribe \u2014 develop and deploy these \u201cclean, renewable socially-just energy resources.\u201d It will also provide federal funding and guidance for how the current irrigation and transportation systems could be replaced and\/or redesigned should Congress ever decide to authorize dam breaching.<\/p>\n Congressional authorization remains a political long shot because the LSRDs are located in eastern Washington\u2019s deeply red voting districts. While some lawmakers in the Northwest have come out in support of breaching \u2014 some have even floated their own proposals<\/a> for how to replace the benefits provided by the dams \u2014 most of the other congressmen and -women representing the region have either stayed silent or opposed the idea.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n Some members of Congress have even gone so far as to block the Biden administration\u2019s proposed path forward. On Nov. 29, Washington Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-WA) leaked a confidential document<\/a> from the administration that included some of the terms of the Dec. 14 agreement. In a press release<\/a>, Newhouse also included a letter addressed to Biden from him and three other members of Congress. Their letter brings up several questions about dam breaching and represents a scathing rebuke to the announcement.<\/p>\n Read Next:<\/strong> Breach or Die: It\u2019s Time to Free the Lower Snake River and Save Idaho\u2019s Wild Salmon<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cWe have numerous questions about provisions in the document that require clarification,\u201d reads the letter signed by Newhouse, along with Reps. Cathy McMorris Rogers (R-WA), Cliff Bentz (R-OR), and Russ Fulcher (R-ID). \u201cIt is imperative that our constituents, whose livelihoods depend on the Columbia River System, have a comprehensive understanding of this document\u2019s contents so they can anticipate and prepare for the wide-ranging impacts that will inevitably be felt across the region should the commitments detailed in this document be realized.\u201d<\/p>\n Although today\u2019s announcement falls short of calling for dam breaching, it helps define the Biden administration\u2019s stance around a key conservation issue. It could also represent a turning point in the long-standing controversy, as it doubles down on the administration\u2019s past commitments<\/a> to restore one the most productive salmon fisheries in North America.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cMany billions of dollars and decades have been wasted by past federal administrations trying to undo the near-extinction disaster the Lower Four Snake River Dams have inflicted on this once world-famous fishery,\u201d executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen\u2019s Associations Glen Spain said in a press release<\/a>. \u201cThis plan finally pulls us out of gridlock by focusing on true salmon restoration rather than continuing a blind march toward salmon extinctions.\u201d<\/p>\n Still, 2024 is an election year, and a different administration in the White House could indefinitely delay any progress toward breaching the LSRDs.<\/p>\n![\"snake](\"https:\/\/www.outdoorlife.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/21\/snake_river_dams_feature_trout_unlimited_SAR_map.jpeg?w=1142\")